Human Rights and Temporary Labour Migration Programme in and from Asia and the Pacific 

“We wanted workers, but human beings came” 

– Max Frisch, 1965

  • Image
    hong-kong

    A woman at Kathmandu airport cries after receiving the body of a family member who died while in Malaysia working on a temporary labour migration programme on January 23, 2021 (Navesh Chitrakar/REUTERS).

  • Image
    thailand

    Migrant workers wearing rainbow face masks pose for pictures at a Migrants’ Pride rally following the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Hong Kong, China November 22, 2020 (Lam Yik/REUTERS).

  • Image
    india

    A girl pulls a cart as Myanmar migrant worker families pass their time under barricade lockdown at Samut Sakhon Shrimp in Samut Sakhon, Thailand, January 26, 2021 (Soe Zeya Tun/REUTERS).

  • Image
    malaysia

    An Indonesian migrant worker, Ari Rohman, pushes a cart as he collects bunches of palm oil fresh fruit during harvest at a plantation in Banting, Selangor, Malaysia, June 10, 2022 (Hasnoor Hussain/REUTERS).

  • Image
    malaysia

    Construction worker Vairavan Karuppaiah, 48, from India, shops at Little India amongst other migrant workers who were part of a pilot programme to allow fully vaccinated migrant workers back to the community after more than a year of movement curbs due to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, in Singapore September 15, 2021 (Su/REUTERS).

DOWNLOAD FULL REPORT

 

Temporary labour migration programmes (TLMPs) are a dominant feature of the migration landscape in and from the Asia-Pacific region, where millions of migrant workers move along these corridors usually to take up fixed-term, low-wage work in sectors such as agriculture, construction, care work or the service industry. This analytical study explores the consequences of these programmes for the human rights of migrant workers and of their families. Recognising that there are well-documented concerns about labour rights abuses on TLMPs, the study focuses on migrants’ experiences beyond the workplace, understanding migrants not just as workers but as human beings and rights-holders fully entitled to all human rights.

The study explores the parameters of these programmes through a human rights lens. The temporariness that is central to TLMPs is used to justify restrictions on a range of human rights, even when migrant workers may undertake repeated migrations on TLMPs in one or more destination State for decades or even effectively for their whole (working) life. At the same time, and even in situations where the labour needs they are filling are permanent, migrant workers on these programmes are usually excluded from pathways to permanent stay or citizenship. Further, most TLMPs pay little attention to ensuring rights prior to, during and after return, while the restrictions inherent in these schemes can facilitate rather than deter irregularity of status.

The study proposes that the guidance provided by international human rights and labour law and standards should be leveraged by countries of destination and origin, in consultation with migrant workers and their families, to design and implement comprehensive labour migration pathways in and from Asia and the Pacific that offer human rights-based alternatives to TLMPs.